Members OnlyEditor’s Note: Aruna Vadgama, Healthcare Practice Specialty (HPS) Administrator, wrote this article in response to increasing numbers of inquiries from HPS members and non-members alike. With all of the attention to this topic, everyone wanted an overview of this Avian Flu issue. This is not a reprint; Vadgama has done extensive research into this current and potentially vital topic.
Although it is seen as a potential threat to public health, Avian Flu may be even more threatening to employees of poultry farms especially those involved in the initial culling of the birds, other farm workers and animal handlers (especially pigs, in addition to poultry). Ironically, these same people may be our first line of defense for both the protection of human health and the reduction of large loses in the agricultural industry, according to US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Guidance for Protecting Workers Against Avian Flu. It is they who are most likely to recognize an infected bird or animal.
Employees of wild game preserves are also at risk. On the medical front, laboratory workers, medical transport workers, and doctors and nurses are also at risk.
In its Avian Influenza Frequently Asked Questions(http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/avian_faqs/en/), the World Health Organization notes that “In an agricultural setting, animal manure containing influenza virus can contaminate dust and soil, causing infection when the contaminated dust is inhaled. Contaminated farm equipment, feed, cages, or shoes can carry the virus from farm to farm. The virus can also be carried on the bodies and feet of animals, such as rodents. "The virus can survive, at cool temperatures, in contaminated manure for at least three months. In water, the virus can survive for up to four days at 72º F and more than 30 days at 32º F. For the highly pathogenic form (of influenza A), studies have shown that a single gram of contaminated manure can contain enough virus to infect 1 million birds.
In a food handling/preparation setting, there is also some concern that avian influenza could be transmitted from uncooked birds or bird products. The World Health Organization has also reported a study that found avian influenza A (H5N1) in imported frozen duck meat. Eggs from infected poultry could also be contaminated with the virus.
OSHA’s workers’ protection guidance document observes that there are other federal agencies and international organizations that have further resources on avian flu.
This article provides the reader with a comprehensive review of the current status of the research, planning and strategies for a pandemic influenza outbreak, especially in the United States. We would certainly welcome comments and potential best responses to this problem and/or practices from our readers to be sent to rheath@asse.org.
In recent months the media has bombarded the community with the news about influenza, shortage of influenza vaccine and injecting fear about possibility of avian flu pandemic worldwide. In order to write this paper the author conducted a literature search to learn the message from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) scientists and experts in preventing the spread of the avian flu. The paper addresses the national and internal synergistic efforts to plan an for effective exposure control plan for averting the influenza outbreaks.
According to the WHO, avian flu is an infectious disease of birds caused by type A strains of the influenza virus. Although there have been avian flu outbreaks in China, Vietnam, Thailand and some parts of Europe in the last few years, the disease (avian flu) was first identified in Italy more than 100 years ago, and it occurs worldwide.
All birds are thought to be susceptible to infection with avian influenza, though some species are more resistant to infection than others. Infection causes a wide spectrum of symptoms in birds, ranging from mild illness to a highly contagious and rapidly fatal disease that may result in severe epidemics. The latter is known as “highly pathogenic avian influenza”. This type of disease is characterized by sudden onset, severe illness, and rapid death, with a mortality that can result in 100%.
Recent research has shown that viruses of low pathogenicity can mutate into highly pathogenic viruses after circulation for sometimes short periods in a poultry population. In the 1983–1984 epidemic in the United States of America, the H5N2 virus initially caused low mortality, but within six months became highly pathogenic, with a mortality rate of 90% in the poultry population. Control of the outbreak required destruction of more than 17 million birds at a cost of nearly US$ 65 million. An epidemic of H5N2 avian influenza, which began in Mexico in 1992, started with low pathogenicity, evolved to the highly fatal form, and was not controlled until 1995. During the1999–2001epidemic in Italy, the H7N1 virus, initially of low pathogenicity, mutated within 9 months to a highly pathogenic form. More than 13 million birds died or were destroyed to control further infections in the poultry populations in Italy.
The quarantining of infected farms and destruction of infected or potentially exposed flocks are standard control measures aimed at preventing spread to other farms and eventual establishment of the virus in a country’s poultry population. Apart from being highly contagious, avian influenza viruses are readily transmitted from farm to farm by mechanical means, such as by contaminated equipment, vehicles, feed, cages, shoes, and or clothing. Highly pathogenic viruses can survive for long periods in the environment, especially when temperatures are low. Stringent sanitary measures on farms can retrieve some degree of protection.
In the absence of prompt control measures backed by good surveillance, epidemics can last for years. For example, an epidemic of H5N2 avian influenza in Mexico in 1992 started with low pathogenicity and evolved into the highly fatal form that was not controlled until 1995.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses usually affect wild birds but have infected and caused serious disease among poultry, such as chickens, in Asia and Europe. Human infections with H5N1 viruses are rare, but have occurred during 2003 - 2005 in Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, and China.
Most cases of H5N1 infection in humans are thought to have occurred from direct contact with infected poultry in the affected countries in Asia.
The threat of new influenza subtypes such as influenza A (H5N1) will be greatly increased if the virus gains the ability for sustained spread from one human to another. Such transmission has not yet been observed. However, a few cases of probable person-to-person spread of H5N1 viruses have been reported, with no instances of transmission continuing beyond one person. For example, one case of probable person-to-person transmission associated with close contact between an ill child and her mother is thought to have occurred in Thailand in September 2004.
H5N1 infections in humans can cause serious disease and death. There currently is no commercially available vaccine to protect people against the H5N1 virus that is being seen in Asia and Europe. However, vaccines are being developed. Research studies to test a vaccine to protect people against the H5N1 virus began in April 2005, and a series of clinical trials is under way. For more information about vaccine development, visit the National Institutes of Health website.
When possible, care should be taken to avoid contact with poultry that has no apparent symptoms, as well as with sick or dead poultry and any surfaces that may have been contaminated by poultry or their feces or secretions. Transmission of H5N1 viruses to two persons through consumption of uncooked duck blood may also have occurred in Vietnam in 2005. Therefore, uncooked poultry or poultry products, including blood, should not be consumed.
Although the scientific community has made remarkable strides in science and medicine during the past century in preventing and curing diseases, they are constantly challenged by new strengths of multi-drug resistant microbes - viruses, bacteria, protozoa and fungi that are forever changing and adapting themselves to the human host and the defenses that humans create.
Likewise, the influenza viruses are notable for their resilience and adaptability. While science has been able to develop highly effective vaccines and treatments for many infectious diseases that threaten public health, developing an effective treatment medium is an ongoing challenge with the influenza virus. Changes in the genetic makeup of the virus require pharmaceutical companies and scientists to develop new vaccines on an annual basis and forecast which strains are likely to predominate.
The H5N1 viruses currently infecting birds in Asia and Europe and some humans in Asia are resistant to amantadine and rimantadine, two antiviral medications commonly used for influenza. The H5N1 viruses are susceptible in a laboratory setting to the antiviral medications oseltamavir and zanamavir, although the effectiveness of these drugs when used for treatment of H5N1 virus infection is unknown. For more information about influenza antiviral drugs, see http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/treatment/.
Every year when humans receive influenza vaccinations, questions arise whether the vaccination will prevent influenza of all types. The challenge is that all type A influenza viruses, including those that regularly cause seasonal epidemics of influenza in humans, are genetically labile and well adapted to elude host defenses. Influenza viruses lack mechanisms for the “proofreading” and repair of errors that occur during replication. As a result of these uncorrected errors, the genetic composition of the viruses changes as they replicate in humans and animals, and the existing strain is replaced with a new antigenic variant. These constant, permanent and usually small changes in the antigenic composition of influenza A viruses are known as antigenic “drift”, which is commonly described as mutation of the virus.
Influenza viruses have a second characteristic of great public health concern: influenza A viruses, including subtypes from different species, can swap or “reassort” genetic materials and merge. This reassortment process, known as antigenic “shift”, results in a novel subtype different from both parent viruses. As populations will have no immunity to the new subtype, and as no existing vaccines can confer protection, antigenic shift has historically resulted in highly lethal pandemics. For this to happen, the novel subtype needs to have genes from human influenza viruses that make it readily transmissible from person to person for a sustainable period. (Source: World Health Organization and CDC)
The tendency of influenza viruses to undergo frequent and permanent antigenic changes necessitates constant monitoring of the global influenza situation and annual adjustments in the composition of influenza vaccines. Both activities have been a cornerstone of the WHO Global Influenza Program, and the DHHS.
Conditions favorable for the emergence of antigenic shift have long been thought to involve humans and working in close proximity to domestic poultry and pigs. Because pigs are susceptible to infection with both avian and mammalian viruses, including human strains, they can serve as a “mixing vessel” for the scrambling of genetic material from human and avian viruses, resulting in the emergence of a novel subtype. Recent events, however, have identified a second possible mechanism. Evidence is mounting that, for at least some of the 15 avian influenza virus subtypes circulating in bird populations, humans themselves can serve as the “mixing vessel”.
Avian influenza viruses do not normally infect species other than birds and pigs. According to the WHO, the first documented infection of humans with an avian influenza virus occurred in Hong Kong in 1997, when the H5N1 strain caused severe respiratory disease in 18 humans, of whom 6 died. The infection of humans coincided with an epidemic of highly pathogenic avian influenza, caused by the same strain, in Hong Kong’s poultry population.
Extensive investigation by the WHO of that outbreak determined that close contact with live infected poultry was the source of human infection. Studies at the genetic level further determined that the virus had jumped directly from birds to humans. Limited transmission to health care workers occurred, but did not cause severe disease.
The WHO reported that a rapid destruction (within three days) of Hong Kong’s entire poultry population, an estimated at around 1.5 million birds, reduced opportunities for further direct transmission to humans and may have averted a pandemic.
The 1997 Honk Kong Flu alarmed public health authorities worldwide, as it marked the first time that an avian influenza virus was transmitted directly to humans and caused severe illness with high mortality. Alarm raised a concern again in February 2003, when an outbreak of H5N1 avian influenza in Hong Kong caused 2 cases and 1 death in members of a family who had recently traveled to southern China. Another child in the family died during that visit, but the cause of death was not known.
Two other avian influenza viruses have recently caused illness in humans. An outbreak of highly pathogenic H7N7 avian influenza, which began in the Netherlands in February 2003, caused the death of one veterinarian two months later, and mild illness in 83 other humans. Mild cases of avian influenza H9N2 in children occurred in Hong Kong in 1999 (two cases) and in mid-December 2003 (one case). H9N2 is not highly pathogenic in birds. (Source: World Health Organization)
The most recent cause for alarm occurred in January 2004, when laboratory tests confirmed the presence of H5N1 avian influenza virus in human cases of severe respiratory disease in the northern part of Viet Nam.
Of the 15 avian influenza virus subtypes, H5N1 is of particular concern for the following reasons:
Pandemics happen when a new type or mutation of influenza virus emerges that infects and is efficiently transmitted between humans. Animals are the most likely reservoir for these emerging viruses; avian viruses played a role in the last three influenza pandemics. Two of these pandemic-causing viruses remain in circulation and are responsible for the majority of influenza cases each year.
As discussed in a previous heading, pandemics have occurred intermittently over centuries. The last three pandemics, in 1918, 1957 and 1968, killed approximately 40 million, 2 million and 1 million people worldwide, respectively. Although the timing cannot be predicted, history and science suggest that we will face one or more pandemics in this century.
The current pandemic threat stems from an unprecedented outbreak of avian influenza in Asia and Europe, caused by the H5N1 strain of the Influenza A virus. To date, the virus has infected birds in 16 countries and has resulted in the deaths, through illness and killing, of approximately 200 million birds across Asia. While traditional control measures have been attempted, the virus is now endemic in Southeast Asia, present in long-range migratory birds, and unlikely to be eradicated soon.
A notable and worrisome feature of the H5N1 virus is its ability to infect a wide range of hosts, including birds and humans. According the DHHS, the virus is known to have infected over 121 people in four countries, resulting in 62 deaths over the past two years. Although the virus has not yet shown an ability to transmit efficiently between humans, as is seen with the annual influenza virus, there is concern that it will acquire this capability through genetic mutation or exchange of genetic material with a human influenza
As a result, and despite annual vaccinations, the United States faces a burden of influenza that result in approximately 36,000 deaths and more than 200,000 hospitalizations each year. In addition to this human toll, influenza is annually responsible for a total cost of over $10 billion in the U.S. (Source: DHHS)
A pandemic, or worldwide outbreak of a new influenza virus, could enhance this impact by overwhelming our health and medical capabilities, potentially resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions of hospitalizations, and hundreds of billions of dollars in direct and indirect costs. To control the pandemic, the DHHS has published the following national Strategy guidelines for preparedness and response activities to mitigate that impact in the United States of America.
The United States of America’s National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza guidelines are based on preparedness and response to an influenza pandemic, with the intent of (1) stopping, slowing or otherwise limiting the spread of a pandemic to the United States; (2) limiting the domestic spread of a pandemic, and mitigating disease, suffering and death; and (3) sustaining infrastructure and mitigating impact to the economy and the functioning of society. (Source: DHHS)
The Strategy is a guiding document to provide a framework for future U.S. Government planning efforts that is consistent with The National Security Strategy and the National Strategy for Homeland Security. This document clearly recognizes that preparing for and responding to a pandemic cannot be viewed as a purely federal responsibility, and that the nation must have a system of plans at all levels of government and in all sectors outside of government that can be integrated to address the pandemic threat. It is guided by the following principles:
The US DHHS Strategy addresses the full spectrum of events that link a farmyard overseas to a farmyard, processing plant, laboratory, etc., to a living room in America. While the circumstances that connect these environments are very different, the strategic principles remain relevant. The pillars of Strategy are:
This Strategy reflects the Federal government’s approach to the pandemic threat. While it provides strategic direction for the departments and agencies of the U.S. Government, it does not attempt to catalogue and assign all responsibilities to the federal government. The implementation of this Strategy and specific responsibilities has still to be developed and communicated.
Preparedness is the underpinning of the entire spectrum of activities, including surveillance, detection, containment and response efforts. In accordance with this plan, the Federal government through the DHHS will support pandemic planning efforts, and clearly communicate expectations to individuals, communities and governments, whether overseas or in the United States, recognizing that all share the responsibility to limit the spread of infection in order to protect populations beyond their borders.
A critical element of pandemic planning is ensuring that people and entities not accustomed to responding to health crises understand the actions and priorities required to prepare for and respond to a pandemic. Those groups include political leadership at all levels of government, non-health components of government, and members of the private sector. Essential planning also includes the coordination of efforts between human and animal health authorities. In order to accomplish this, the following plan of action is essential:
Strategy |
Plan of Action |
Pillar One: Preparedness and Communication |
|
Communicating Expectations and Responsibilities |
|
Producing and Stockpiling Vaccines, Antivirals and Medical Material |
In combination with traditional public health measures, vaccines and antiviral drugs form the foundation of national infection control strategy. Vaccination is the most important element of this strategy, but we acknowledge that a two-pronged strategy incorporating both vaccines and antivirals is essential. To establish production capacity and stockpiles in support of our containment and response strategies, the following measures need to be implemented:
Expand the public health recommendations for domestic seasonal influenza vaccination and encourage the same practice internationally. Expand the domestic supply of avian influenza vaccine to control a domestic outbreak of avian influenza in bird populations. |
Establishing Distribution Plans for Vaccines and Antivirals |
It is essential to prioritize the allocation of countermeasures (vaccines and antivirals) that are in limited supply and define effective distribution modalities during a pandemic. Thus it is important to:
|
Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Accelerating Development |
Research and development of vaccines, antivirals, adjuvants and diagnostics represents our best defense against a pandemic. To realize the goal of next-generation countermeasures against influenza, we must make significant and targeted investments in promising technologies. Thus it will be necessary to:
|
Early warning of a pandemic and our ability to closely track the spread of avian influenza outbreak is critical to being able to rapidly deploy resources to contain the spread of the virus. An effective surveillance and detection system will save lives by allowing us to activate our response plans before the arrival of a pandemic virus to the U.S., activate additional surveillance systems, and initiate vaccine production and administration.
Pillar Two: Surveillance and Detection Ensuring Rapid Reporting of Outbreaks |
To support our need for “situational awareness,” both domestically and internationally, it will be necessary to:
|
Using Surveillance to Limit Spread |
Although influenza does not respect geographic or political borders, entry to and egress from affected areas represent opportunities to control or at the very least slow the spread of infection. In parallel to our containment measures, it will be necessary to:
|
Pillar Three: Response and Containment We recognize that a virus with pandemic potential anywhere represents a risk to populations everywhere. transmission to locations around the globe. |
|
Containing Outbreaks |
The most effective way to protect the American population is to contain an outbreak beyond the borders of the U.S. While we work to prevent a pandemic from reaching our shores, we recognize that slowing or limiting the spread of the outbreak is a more realistic outcome and can save many lives. In support of our containment strategy, it will be necessary to:
|
Leveraging National Medical and Public Health Surge Capacity |
Rather than generating a focal point of casualties, the medical burden of a pandemic is likely to be distributed in communities across the nation for an extended period of time. In order to save lives and limit suffering, it will be necessary to:
|
Sustaining Infrastructure, Essential Services and the Economy |
Movement of essential personnel, goods and services, and maintenance of critical infrastructure are necessary during an event that spans months in any given community. The private sector and critical infrastructure entities must respond in a manner that allows them to maintain the essential elements of their operations for a prolonged period of time, in order to prevent severe disruption of life in our communities. To ensure this, it will be necessary to:
|
Ensuring Effective Risk Communication |
Effective risk communication is essential to inform the public and mitigate panic. It will be necessary to:
|
The Federal Government |
While the Federal government plays a critical role in elements of preparedness and response to a pandemic, the success of these measures is predicated on actions taken at the individual level and in states and communities. Federal responsibilities include the following:
|
States and Localities |
Our communities are on the front lines of a pandemic and will face many challenges in maintaining continuity of society in the face of widespread illness and increased demand on most essential government services. State and local responsibilities include the following:
|
The Private Sector and Critical Infrastructure Entities |
The private sector represents an essential pillar of our society because of the essential goods and services that it provides. Moreover, it touches the majority of our population on a daily basis, through an employer-employee or vendor-customer relationship. For these reasons, it is essential that the U.S. private sector be engaged in all preparedness and response activities for a pandemic.
|
Individuals and Families |
The critical role of individuals and families in controlling a pandemic cannot be overstated. Modeling of the transmission of influenza vividly illustrates the impact of one individual’s behavior on the spread of disease, by showing that an infection carried by one person can be transmitted to tens or hundreds of others. For this reason, individual action is perhaps the most important element of pandemic preparedness and response. Education on pandemic preparedness for the population should begin before a pandemic, should be provided by all levels of government and the private sector, and should occur in the context of preventing the transmission of any infection, such as the annual influenza or the common cold. Responsibilities of the individual and families include:
|
International Partners |
The international partnerships and corroboration, with the United Nations, international organizations and private non-profit organizations, to amplify our efforts, and will engage them on a multilateral and bilateral basis. Our international effort to contain and mitigate the effects of an outbreak of pandemic influenza is a central component of our overall strategy. In many ways, the character and quality of the U.S. response |
Based on historical patterns, influenza pandemics can be expected to occur, on average, three to four times each century when new virus subtypes emerge and are readily transmitted from person to person. However, the occurrence of influenza pandemics is unpredictable. Experts do agree though that another influenza pandemic is inevitable and possibly imminent. Most influenza experts also agree that the prompt culling of Hong Kong’s entire poultry population in 1997 probably averted a pandemic.
The following measures can help minimize the global public health risks that could arise from large outbreaks of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in birds. An immediate priority is to halt further spread of epidemics in poultry populations. This strategy works to reduce opportunities for human exposure to the virus. Vaccination of persons at high risk of exposure to infected poultry, using existing vaccines effective against currently circulating human influenza strains, can reduce the likelihood of co-infection of humans with avian and influenza strains, and thus reduce the risk that genes will be exchanged. Workers involved in the culling of poultry flocks must be protected and therefore hopefully reduce the likelihood of illness or gene swapping or mutation. These workers should also receive antiviral drugs as a prophylactic measure.
Editor’s Note: Again from OSHA’s workers’ protection guidance document: Exposure to infected poultry and their feces or dust contaminated with feces has been associated with human infection; however this is a rare occurrence. The following summarizes the recommendations that have been developed by the CDC and the WHO because human infections have occurred in Asia during the current poultry epidemic. They will be updated as more information becomes available. http://www.who.int/csr/don/2004_01_15/en/
When cases of avian influenza in humans occur, information on the extent of influenza infection in animals as well as humans and on circulating influenza viruses is urgently needed to aid the assessment of risks to public health and to guide the best protective measures. Thorough investigation of each case is also essential. While WHO and the members of its global influenza network, together with other international agencies, can assist with many of these activities, the successful containment of public health risks also depends on the epidemiological and laboratory capacity of affected countries and the adequacy of surveillance systems already in place.
Editor’s Note: OSHA’s workers’ protection guidance document notes that highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) is classified as a select agent and must be worked with under Biosafety Level (BSL) 3+ laboratory conditions. Furthermore, all employers processing biologic specimens suspected of being infected with influenza A (H5N1) must ensure that their employees comply with all provisions of 29 CFR 1910.1030 for employee protection against bloodborne pathogens.
While all these activities can reduce the likelihood that a pandemic strain will emerge, the question of whether another influenza pandemic can be averted cannot be answered with certainty.
Published information about the clinical course of human infection with H5N1 avian influenza is limited to studies of cases in the 1997 Hong Kong outbreak. In that outbreak, patients developed symptoms of fever, sore throat, and cough and, in several of the fatal cases, severe respiratory distress secondary to viral pneumonia. Previously healthy adults and children, and some with chronic medical conditions, were affected.
Tests for diagnosing all influenza strains of animals and humans are rapid and reliable. Many laboratories in the WHO global influenza network have the necessary high-security facilities and reagents for performing these tests as well as considerable experience. Rapid bedside tests for the diagnosis of human influenza are also available, but do not have the precision of the more extensive laboratory testing that is currently needed to fully understand the most recent cases and determine whether human infection is spreading, either directly from birds or from person to person.
Antiviral drugs, some of which can be used for both treatment and prevention, are clinically effective against Influenza A virus strains in otherwise healthy adults and children, but have some limitations. Some of these drugs are also expensive and supplies are limited.
Experience in the production of influenza vaccines is also considerable, particularly as vaccine composition changes each year to match changes in circulating virus due to antigenic drift. However, at least four months would be needed to produce a new vaccine, in significant quantities, capable of conferring protection against a new virus subtype.
Communities, Workplaces and Individuals Should :
Aruna Vadgama is Director of Quality Resources at the Menninger Clinic in Houston TX. She is Administrator for the ASSE Healthcare Practice Specialty. She can be contacted at avadgama@menninger.edu.